
The Continuum of Community Involvement
Based on: Alana Albee (1998)
Tools for Change - a Practical Guide to Community Indicators of Sustainability (Part 3):
Sustainability Indicators Partnership Scotland (SIPS)

There are those who talk of 'community involvement' as a better means of manipulating
people - ie of getting them to do what the external agents have already decided they
should do. This can be done more or less crudely. When done well the community will
believe that it has freely chosen to do what it is now doing. This is 'elegant power'.
When done badly the community will sabotage the external agenda by being highly
'unco-operative'.
There are those who talk of 'community involvement' as a means of engaging people such
that they take more control of their own lives. In this case the external agent enables
the community to decide for itself what it wants to do, make action plans, and carry them
out successfully. The external task in this case is facilitation and the agent will have
succeeded when his services are no longer required.
Between the extremes of manipulation and community control as outlined above there are
many options. They are listed in the following table. The most suitable approach will
depend on the circumstances eg if a tower block goes on fire then it is probably best that
people allow themselves to be crudely and urgently manipulated by the firemen. If the
problem is petty crime and vandalism in that same tower block it may be best for the tower
block community to figure out its own solutions, perhaps in partnerhip with the police or
the social workers who might help to facilitate consultation between neighbours.